Monthly Archives: November 2009

Can I Discharge My Medical Bills in Bankruptcy?

This seems an obvious question, but, as an article in today’s New York Times discusses, medical bills are a primary reason that many Americans file for bankruptcy. It is certainly the case among most, if not all, of my clients in the Detroit, Michigan area, that medical bills comprise a huge portion of the debt that I see. Amongst those that I meet who are roughly age 35 or under, nearly all are seeking bankruptcy as a solution entirely due to huge medical bills. Younger people in this country, as a statistical group, are significantly underinsured or uninsured entirely, and one bad medical emergency can cripple them financially for years to come, even, at times, dwarfing the outrageous obligations that today’s student loan burdens are imposing on new graduates.

Whether these medical bills can be discharged through bankruptcy is, therefore, a question worth answering outright—because so many of my clients do ask it. The answer is slightly different depending upon whether you’re talking about a Chapter 7 or a Chapter 13 bankruptcy, but, in both cases, the answer should give those struggling with impossible medical debt some basis for optimism.

In a Chapter 7 bankruptcy, the answer is an unqualified “YES!” In a Chapter 7, medical bills are treated the same as credit-card and other forms of unsecured debt: they are completely discharged. The only complication arises from debtors themselves, many of whom do have a positive and long-term relationship with their doctors and a strong desire to maintain that relationship. While many Americans have not had consistently high-quality or considerate medical care, others do want to keep using a doctor or other medical professional that they have come to know and trust over many years. They don’t want to “stiff” these doctors.

This is a very common feeling … It is admirable and understandable. But anyone shouldering an amount of medical debt that is so high that it is causing them to consider bankruptcy in the first place is between a rock and a hard place: the doctor did not, in turn, feel sentimental enough about the relationship to charge less in the first place, after all. They may be willing to work with longtime patients in offering payment plans and other options, but, in my experience, most will otherwise have no reservation about referring debtors to aggressive collection agencies to collect the amount owed. Medical collection agencies are among the most obnoxious that I have encountered in my practice, and, in my opinion, no one should feel badly about using the legal option of bankruptcy to protect themselves and their families.

In a Chapter 13 bankruptcy, the answer is slightly more complicated. Chapter 13 is a reorganization process through which debtors and their attorneys pay off debt through a 3-5 year payment plan. Debts are paid according to a certain priority established by the Federal Bankruptcy Code. As in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy, medical bills are classifed as unsecured debt, and unsecured debt is paid lastly in a Chapter 13 plan, after “secured” debt like home mortgages and “priority” debt like federal and state taxes and child-support. There are many requirements for the approval of these payment plans, but, generally, at the end of the 3-5 year period, providing that enough of the unsecured debt has been paid by the plan, the remaining unsecured debt is discharged as in a Chapter 7 liquidation. Therefore, the discharge of medical debt in a Chapter 13 is not as broadly sweeping as in a Chapter 7. Depending on how much credit-card and other unsecured debt a person has, some percentage of the medical debt will have to paid off through the Chapter 13 plan.

Medical debt is out of control in this country. Anyone receiving a bill from their local hospital for something as simple as an MRI test is well aware of this. More complicated procedures can derail a person’s financial planning for years to come. However, bankruptcy, whichever form is most appropriate for each individual, does provide a solution. It is not a solution that always feels right, as doctors are people with whom we all would like to develop a positive relationship. But, after the service has been rendered and the bills mailed, no one should feel badly about choosing to not live as a slave to a type of debt that no one else in our governmental system is working very hard to lower for you, regardless of what the headlines are saying about the insurance “reform” bill working its way through the Senate as I write.

If you have questions about medical bills and bankruptcy, please contact me at jhilla@aronofflinnell.com or (248) 977-4182 to schedule a free, initial consultation.

What Happens If I Declare Bankruptcy and am Listed as a Joint Account-Holder on Someone Else’s Bank Account?

Several times in recent weeks, individuals I’ve counseled wishing to declare bankruptcy have revealed to me that, in addition to their personal bank accounts, they are also listed as “joint holders” on someone else’s bank accounts, such as an elderly relative, sibling, or friend. (For the sake of clarity, I am not discussing joint bank accounts between married individuals in this post.) Particularly in the case of elderly parents, this is often for convenience or estate-planning purposes, as the parent anticipates the possibility that, at some point, they may be physically unable to gain access to their needed funds. In such cases, the jointly named potential bankruptcy filer may have contributed little or no funds to the account at all; they are simply listed as a user in case their parent needs assistance with finance-related daily activities. They own 0% of the funds in the accounts, yet they are listed as an “owner” of the account for all general purposes. This raises a serious question when they need financial assistance themselves, in the form of bankruptcy: will those funds be protected from the court-appointed  bankruptcy trustee, whose job it is to liquidate all available assets for the benefit of the creditors whose debts are to be discharged in the bankruptcy?

In Michigan, where I practice, this question is framed with a point of state law: MCL 487.703  holds that there is a presumption of joint ownership of any funds in a bank account with joint users listed in this way. Although the bankruptcy process itself is governed by Federal law, certain underlying considerations in the process are dependent upon the laws of the state in which the bankruptcy is being filed. This is such a consideration.

What that means, then, is that, in Michigan, if you are listed on someone’s bank account and that account has, for example, $10,000 of that person’s money in it, Michigan state law (and the Eastern and Western Federal District Courts along with it) will presume that $5,000 of that money belongs to you.

The potential effects of that presumption are serious and should certainly be taken into consideration when deciding to file bankruptcy. However, the presumption of joint ownership that I’ve described is rebuttable, which means that, if an individual has evidence that proves that they don’t own the funds in the account, the bankruptcy court should leave the funds unaffected.

Depending on the amount of money involved (bankruptcy trustees earn a percentage of the funds liquidated for creditors’ benefit), this may be easier to accomplish or more difficult to accomplish. Depending on the specifics of each individual situation, there are different ways of listing the joint accounts in the bankruptcy petition to foreclose the possibility that the trustee will become interested in liquidating an account that does not actually belong to the filing debtor. It may even be preferable to have the accounts closed prior to the filing of the bankruptcy, though this is a delicate operation and should certainly not be considered if any percentage of the funds do indeed belong to the filing debtor.

One thing is clear, in any case: all such accounts should be disclosed to your bankruptcy attorney who will, in turn, make the correct decision as to how best to disclose and list them in the bankruptcy petition. Such situations are delicate but are also easily managed by a knowledgeable attorney. Complications such as this often trip up individuals opting to file for bankruptcy without the use of an attorney and are a strong example of how something that seems simple and obvious can have serious ramifications when attempted without qualified legal advice.

If you are listed on another’s bank accounts and are considering filing for bankruptcy, please contact me at jhilla@aronofflinnell.com or (248) 977-4182 to schedule a free, initial consultation so that we may best decide, together, how to protect your assets through the bankruptcy process.

* * *

I’d like to thank the many generous NACBA attorneys who have recently contributed to my knowledge on this subject.

What Assets Should I Disclose to My Bankruptcy Attorney?

As a bankruptcy attorney, I’m constantly surprised by the number of clients or potential clients I speak to who believe that, to file Chapter 7 or Chapter 13, they need to move, hide, or sell off assets in order to succeed in their filing. Worse, people often admit that they have been counseled by friends or relatives to hide assets from me, their retained attorney. Fortunately, none of my clients have actually done anything like that, but the fact that so many believe that they should at least consider failing to disclose or hiding their assets suggests that there is a great deal of misinformation about the bankruptcy process at large in the metro Detroit, Michigan area, where I practice.

One of the best rules of thumb in bankruptcy filing is applicable to virtually every area of life: honesty is the best policy. It is always best to disclose all of your assets, right down to your pet gerbil and your baby’s miniature sneakers. Why? First of all, hiding assets is fraudulent and could result not only in the dismissal of the petition that you have paid your lawyer to create and file for you but also could result in criminal charges. If you’re filing for bankruptcy in the first place, chances are good that hiding your mini-bike in a friend’s garage or transferring its title to your cousin’s sister is not going to make conditions appreciably better for you in the wide scheme of things.

Secondly, as your attorney, I am your representative. I am there to make sure that your petition succeeds and that you receive a successful discharge in the end. Attorney-client confidentiality is the bedrock of our relationship, and you can bet that, if you tell me honestly what assets and liabilities you are shouldering, I will tell you honestly how best to deal with it. If that potentially includes advice to wait in your filing or to not file bankruptcy at all, it is best that you know that in advance, straight up, from someone you can trust—if for no other reason than you have paid me to work for you.

However, the bottom-line answer that I give to my clients who ask about such tactics is, “Why would you bother?” It is true that some potential bankruptcy petitioners do have significant assets to deal with. In this economy, many bankruptcy filings are indeed arising from members of the middle and even upper-class who would not have been put into that position in years past. Such filers may indeed have multiple real properties, multiple vehicles, even boats or yachts or significant corporate holdings or cash reserves. Otherwise, though, most Chapter 7 filings do not involve a critical mass of luxury items. Rather, those petitions generally involve the sorts of things that working people tend to have: a home, a car or two, and personal possessions.

If you are one of the minority of potential bankruptcy filers who do have significant holdings of what might be classified as luxury goods, you should indeed face up to the reality that, if you file bankruptcy, you will most likely lose some property, especially in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy. If you are amongst the majority of potential filers, however, who have gathered the sorts of everyday possessions that most people gather as they go about living their lives, there is no need to worry that you will lose anything: the statutory bankruptcy exemptions provided for by the Bankruptcy Code are quite adequate to protect your personal possessions from liquidation 99% of the time.

Never panic. Always disclose, especially to your attorney. Honesty really is the best policy.

If you have any questions about whether bankruptcy is an appropriate choice for you, please contact me at jhilla@aronofflinnell.com or (248) 977-4182 to schedule a free, initial consultation.