Tag Archives: payment plan

How Can a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Help Me Pay Down my Student Loans?

I have addressed the high bar to the discharge of student loan debt in bankruptcy on this blog in earlier posts. It remains true that student loans are very largely not dischargeable in bankruptcy. However, it is not true that bankruptcy cannot assist in managing or even paying down student loan debt.

A Chapter 13 bankruptcy, on the other hand, although it will not “discharge” non-dischargeable student loan debt any more than a Chapter 7 would, can be useful in obtaining relief from student loan payments for a lengthier period of time and managing the eventual pay-down of the debt balance.

Continue reading

Can I Keep My Jewelry if I File for Bankruptcy?

There is a quick and a not-so-quick answer to this question, depending upon whether you are filing Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 bankruptcy.  The quick answer pertains to Chapter 13 bankrupties: if you are filing a Chapter 13 bankruptcy, the answer is YES, you will be able to keep you jewelry, no matter how valuable it is or much of it you have. The reason for this is that Chapter 13 bankruptcies are funded not through the liquidation of assets as Chapter 7 bankruptcies are but through the filing debtor’s income. Chapter 13 bankruptcies are payment-plans, essentially, and, throughout the 3-5 year life of the plan, the petitioning debtor makes a monthly payment according to the terms of the plan. It is that monthly payment that distributes “asset” to the debtors’ creditors, and the debtor’s property has nothing to do with it.

The not-so-quick answer pertains to Chapter 7 bankruptcies. A Chapter 7 bankruptcy is a complete liquidation of debt, not a reorganization as is a Chapter 13. Since all of a debtor’s debts are essentially erased through the Chapter 7 process, the creditors whose debts will be discharged by the bankruptcy are entitled to the proceeds of any of the debtor’s personal property that the court-appointed Trustee overseeing the Chapter 7 for the Bankruptcy Court is entitled to liquidate. That is to say, the extent to which creditors may have their debts satisfied is funded directly by the debtor’s personal property in a Chapter 7 and not by a monthly payment made from the debtor’s earned income as in a Chapter 13.

That being the case, the question for ANY property belonging to a debtor (jewelry or otherwise) is: “What property is the Trustee entitled to liquidate for those creditors?”

The Trustee may liquidate property that is, in short, not exempt from the “Bankruptcy Estate” that is created when the debtor files the bankruptcy petition. The Bankruptcy Estate is a legal estate much like a probate estate that is administered by a state court when someone passes away without a proper will having been written. In a probate matter, the state court determines the disposition of the deceased’s property. In a bankruptcy, the federal bankruptcy court, in the person of the trustee, determines the disposition on behalf of the creditors. Everything in the Bankruptcy Estate is able to be liquidated by the Trustee, and all of the debtor’s personal property and other assets are automatically part of the Estate—unless they are specifically, item by item, exempted from the Estate through the use of various exemptions that are provided in the Bankruptcy Code.

One of the more specific exemptions available in the Code is the exemption for a person’s jewelry.

The Federal exemption for jewelry is currently $1350.00. Jewelry that is higher in value than that amount may, in some cases, be covered by the “wildcard” exemption that is available to some debtors not utilizing their full homestead exemption. Otherwise, it may not be fully exempt and may be subject to liquidation by the Trustee.

The exemption for jewelry in Michigan, where I practice, is lower still: the Michigan exemptions (which be used instead of the Federal exemptions) provide for an exemption of just $3000.00 for ALL household goods, utensils, books, appliances, and jewelry—with the further provision that no one item be worth more than $450.00.

Therefore, the answer to the question of whether or not you may keep your jewelry in bankruptcy is, in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy, maybe. It depends upon the value of your jewelry and the availability of the “wildcard” exemption after the home you live in and all of your other personal property is taken into account and also whether or not you are using the Federal or state exemptions for your area. Further, when it comes to engagement rings and jewelry of particular sentimental value, the Trustees in your region may be lenient about liquidating the property even if not exempt, but this varies wildly by region and is best not to be counted upon.

If you have questions about the possibility of retaining your personal property through a Chapter 7 or a Chapter 13 bankruptcy, please contact me at jhilla@aronofflinnell.com or (248) 977-4182 to schedule a free, initial consultation.

Is Debt Consolidation a Good Alternative to Bankruptcy?

Many consumers question whether “debt elimination,” which would occur under, for example, a Chapter 7 bankruptcy filing, is a better or worse option with regard to their future credit-scores than “debt consolidation,” a non-bankruptcy-related procedure. The answer is that it depends.

What it depends upon is, first, your current credit standing. A bankruptcy will always be detrimental to your credit-score and will remain on your credit-report for 10 years. However, there comes a point for consumers who have suffered financial set-backs where the impact of a bankruptcy upon their credit-score is not as harmful as lingering in a state of financial decline. This occurs when they have already missed multiple payments, are in arrears on home or auto payments, or possibly have been foreclosed upon or had a vehicle repossessed. At this point, the bankruptcy filing is actually, effectively, an improvement. That is, when you file for bankruptcy and your debt is discharged, you are at least in a state of rebuilding your financial well-being and credit-score rather than treading water in a state of steady decline and suffering incessant collection attempts and late-fee charge application.

Even more to the point, whether debt consolidation is a good option, depends greatly upon the means by which you are consolidating your debt. For the most part, however, debt consolidation is not a good deal for the consumer in need.

There are legitimate credit counseling agencies who provide the pre-bankruptcy petition credit counseling that is required by bankruptcy law. These agencies sometimes recommend a debt management plan, which, for some debtors, may provide a non-bankruptcy solution to their debt management problems. Often, however, such plans are not a good idea as they usually do not reduce the principal owed by the debtor and don’t help with secured debt, such as home mortgages or auto loans.

Worse, there the other “debt consolidators” that debtors considering bankruptcy tend to run into. These are for-profit companies that claim to be able to negotiate with a debtor’s creditors. These companies do not have any legal means of convincing a credit card issuer or other creditor to reduce a debtor’s debt, and, often, they simply take the debtor’s money in the form of a monthly “lump” payment and hold onto it. Very few debtors end up completing the “consolidation” programs offered by these companies, and, in my experience, they often end up being just another creditor listed in the bankruptcy petition when the debtor ends up filing for bankruptcy anyway.

In short, be very careful of which company is offering you a “debt consolidation” plan. For the most part, it is not a good deal and may even be harmful to many consumers, regardless of whether they go on to consider filing for bankruptcy as an option. If you have any questions about which option is the right one for you, please contact me at jhilla@aronofflinnell.com or (248) 977-4182 to schedule a free, initial consultation.

New Year, New Solutions?

The passing of a year is always an optimistic time for most of us. It’s a little arbitrary, probably, to stand on the threshold of a new year and expect that much will change when, usually, January 1st is never all that much different from the day before it, but we all have that expectation regardless. We formulate New Year resolutions or decide steadfastly that we don’t require them, and we step forward into another year with the notion of change set firmly in mind. “This year,” we tell ourselves, “it’s all going to come together for me.”

That’s as true for me as it is for anyone else. I have great hopes and expectations for 2009 that may or may not be borne out as events unfold. Like everyone else, I have no guarantees that anything will work out particularly well for me, but, like absolutely everyone else, I move forward with my fingers crossed, doing what needs to be done. It’s simply human nature to retain at least enough optimism to keep going forward regardless of whatever it is that may be weighing us down. The New Year holiday represents that optimistic side of our nature as human beings, and it is that side of our nature that does bring us our greatest successes, even when the odds are against us.

It does happen that the odds are against many of us at this particular time in our history. Particularly here in Detroit and the greater southeast Michigan area, many are having a tough time right now. Regardless, just as our political leaders must adapt to new circumstances and develop new strategies for our state and our nation’s economic well-being, we must, individually, do the same. Nobody needs to be told to tighten their belt when the going gets rough, but the details of how to do it are sometimes easier said than done. And, when it comes to dealing with overwhelming amounts of debt in the face of job-loss, medical issues, or other serious matters, there’s nothing easy about it.

In particular, if your belt has been tightened and tightened again and you are considering filing for bankruptcy in the coming year, there are a few basic precautions you can take to improve the odds for yourself—and for your coming year.

Stop Using Credit-Cards

This is one of those “easier said than done” things, especially if your situation has become so strained that you are, to some extent, living off of your credit-card right now. But credit-card debt is expensive in the long-term. It isn’t always to focus on the long-term when the short-term has become difficult, but interest-rate changes, the inflated rates on cash-advances on a credit card, and the ability of the card issuers to alter the terms of your agreement with them at virtually any time throughout the length of your relationship means that, unless you’re careful, you could make a short-term difficulty into a very long-term one.

Further, if you are considering bankruptcy anytime in the coming year, you don’t want to give your creditors any justifiable reason to claim that your bankruptcy petition is fraudulent and should be dismissed. Use of a credit-card when you know you will be filing for bankruptcy is fraud.

Stay Current on Your Car and Mortgage Payments

Again, if you’re in trouble, this may be a very difficult thing to accomplish. It may, in fact, be the primary reason you consider filing for bankruptcy. In general, especially here in Metro Detroit, where the public transportation options are slim to none, it is important to have a reliable vehicle before, during, and after a financial crisis. Losing a car or, especially, a home will obviously worsen the odds that you will emerge from the crisis. But, if you are planning to file bankruptcy and hope to save a home or vehicle, it is also important to continue demonstrating your ability to make payments on the property so that your Chapter 13 plan will appear effective to the Bankruptcy Trustee who will oversee your case.

Close Unnecessary Bank-Accounts

If you have accounts that you don’t use or rarely use, transfer the funds to other accounts and close them out. It just makes things easier.

Keep Good Records

Complete and accurate records of your financial history will enable a bankruptcy attorney to do the best job for you that he or she can.

These are just a few of several steps you can take to make not only the short-term possibility of a Happy New Year alive but also the long-term possibility. If it is not possible for you to take at least the first two steps I’ve discussed above, it is possible that a bankruptcy may be the best financial course of action for you in the New Year. Even that, however, is still cause for optimism. A bankruptcy is, after all, not an ending but a new beginning, like the New Year holiday itself, and, if your situation requires that drastic step, it should be viewed as an optimistic move forward.

If you are considering filing for bankruptcy or would like to discuss your financial options, please contact me at jhilla@aronofflinnell.com or (248) 977-4182 to schedule a free, initial consultation.

Meanwhile, a very Happy New Year to all of you!

How Will My Bankruptcy Filing Affect the Co-Signers on My Loans?

It is inevitable that filing for bankruptcy can have an impact beyond the sphere of our own personal finances. Many people (including myself) have co-signed loans for others, had loans co-signed by others, or both. Frequently, those who have co-signed loans for us are our family or friends. Likewise, those we have co-signed for are frequently personal acquaintances. In either case, the filing of a bankruptcy petition can ripple across this financial support network, and rarely is it likely to endear us to one another.

Filing for bankruptcy when you have debts the loans for which were co-signed by family or friends is indeed likely to affect them adversely. If you file for bankruptcy, any co-signers on debts affected by the automatic stay that goes into effect against creditors when a bankruptcy petition is filed may suffer collection attempts against them. The automatic stay prevents creditors from pursuing you for payment, but it does not—except as I will describe below—prevent them from pursuing your co-signers. Obviously, although it may make for an uncomfortable conversation with your co-signing friends and family-members, etiquette, if not the law, may require a little fair warning about what you are planning.

However, in Chapter 13 bankruptcy filings, there is an additional stay that goes into effect when the petition is filed: the Co-Debtor Stay. This stay prohibits any attempt by the debtor’s creditors to collect the affected debt from any co-signers. For this stay to operate, the co-debtor need only have provided some security for the loan and need not even be personally liable for the debt. It is limited, though, to consumer debts (i.e., not business debts, some forms of legal and tax liability, and other obligations not incurred for a personal, family, or household purpose) and to co-debtors who did not become obligated through “the ordinary course of business.” Further, this stay is vulnerable to some significant limitations: it automatically ends if the bankruptcy is closed or dismissed or converted to another Chapter (other than 12), and the court may lift it for various reasons, including a sufficient level of harm to the creditor or it the Chapter 13 plan does not provide for payment in full of the creditor’s claim.

Regardless, on the up-side, many of the limitations to the automatic stay instituted in the 2005 amendments to the Bankruptcy Code do not apply to the Chapter 13 Co-Debtor Stay. Thus, it remains a viable reason for the selection of a Chapter 13 bankruptcy rather than a Chapter 7. It is certainly something to keep in mind if you have suffered a job-loss, medical problem, or other issue leading you to consider filing for bankruptcy, but you do not wish to endanger the financial well-being of those who have helped you in the past.

If you are considering filing for bankruptcy and are concerned about the impact it may have up co-signers, please contact me at jhilla@aronofflinnell.com or (248) 977-4182 to schedule a free, initial consultation.

Can I Discharge Traffic Tickets in Bankruptcy?

This is probably one of the common questions I receive from potential bankruptcy clients. And the short-answer is no, you cannot discharge traffic tickets in bankruptcy. This is what you will generally find in the “FAQ” section of many bankruptcy attorneys’ websites. However, there is a little more to it than that.

That short-answer really applies to Chapter 7 bankruptcy in particular. Under Chapter 7, traffic tickets are non-dischargeable under Section 523(a)(7) of the Bankruptcy Code, which specifically states that fines and penalties owed to and for the benefit of governmental units are non-dischargeable. This includes traffic tickets and other criminal (or punitive) fines.

Under  Chapter 13, however, some of these debts may be effectively dischargeable. Some restitution debts imposed by courts—those included in a sentence for the conviction of a crime—are non-dischargeable, but other restitution debts may be discharged. Fines imposed directly (not as a condition of probation or imposed in pre-trial hearings, etc.) as a criminal penalty are non-dischargeable. The question here is whether the fine is imposed as part of a sentence for the conviction of a crime. The definition of and associated penalties for traffic (and most other non-Federal) crimes is a matter of state law. Thus, it is largely a question of state law where the offense occurs whether a traffic fine can be discharged in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy. Some states define “crimes” as only misdemeanors and felonies and not civil infractions, moving-violations, and other categories of offense for which run-of-the-mill traffic tickets may be issued.

In Michigan, where I practice, this is the case. Traffic offenses in Michigan are divided into 2 categories: crimes and civil infractions. Crimes are misdemeanors and felonies only. Criminal traffic offenses are, as one would expect, serious violations such as reckless driving, leaving the scene of an accident, driving with a suspended license, fleeing and eluding police, operating while intoxicated, and “felonious driving.” (Reckless and felonious driving are often charged as lesser-included offenses of other misdemeanor or felony charges.) Additionally, even if charged with a civil infraction only, failing to answer a summons or to follow the directives of the ticket received can incur a more serious criminal penalty.

When such fines are dischargeable under Chapter 13, they may be allocated a category of debt in the Chapter 13 payment plan along with other unsecured debt, which is generally paid secondarily to secured debt and other priority debts, although this is not always a certainty. Some governmental debt may be entitled to priority payment status. However, even non-dischargeable criminal fines or governmental penalties may still be provided for in a Chapter 13 plan, although they will not be able to be discharged through the plan. Otherwise, general unsecured debt which may include dischargeable traffic fines, is afforded a lower priority payment status than other types of debt, and the priority debt and secured debt must be paid first, allowing the unsecured, non-priority debt to be discharged.

If you have any questions about traffic penalties in bankruptcy, please contact me at jhilla@aronofflinnell.com or (248) 977-4182 to schedule a free, initial consultation.

Can Your Attorney Advise You to Incur More Debt Prior to Filing Bankruptcy?

It depends where you live.

This week, the Fifth Circuit decided that a provision of the Bankruptcy Code added by the 2005 BAPCPA amendments (which were largely drafted by financial industry lobbyists), Section 526(a)(4), prohibits attorneys from advising their clients to incur more debt prior to filing for bankruptcy.

Section 526(a)(4) reads: “A debt relief agency shall not … advise an assisted person or prospective assisted person to incur more debt in contemplation of such person filing a case under this title or to pay an attorney or bankruptcy petition preparer fee or charge for services performed as part of preparing for or representing a debtor in a case under this title.”

As reported by CreditSlips, the Fifth Circuit decided, contrary to a decision on the same language by the 8th Circuit, that this was not an unconstitutional restriction on the free speech of attorneys under the First Amendment. The court made this decision, despite the clear language of the statute, which broadly prohibits the proffering of this legal advice, period, using a technique of judicial statutory interpretation called the “doctrine of constitutional avoidance.” This so-called “doctrine” states, basically, that, if a given interpretation of a statute would cause Constitutional problems, it would be interpreted differently, unless Congress clearly determined it should not.

In the case of Section 526(a)(4), according to the Fifth Circuit, apparently that means that, since a plain reading of the statute appears to include an unconstitutional prohibition on the free speech of attorneys, it should just be interpreted as not prohibiting free speech. Uh, right. The Fifth accomplished this by reading into the statute’s use of the phrase “in contemplation of” an intent to abuse the bankruptcy system. So, basically, in the Fifth Circuit, if a debtor’s attorney intends to abuse the bankruptcy system by advising a debtor to incur more debt prior to filing, that’s not a First Amendment violation. But, if they don’t intend to abuse the system in doing so, it is. Good luck figuring out where the intent exists and where it doesn’t, Fifth Circuit Trustees and Judges!

The Eighth Circuit decided the same issue quite differently. The Eighth Circuit found that the statute was indeed unconstitutionally overbroad in its plain language. It noted that there are many cases where it is indeed appropriate for a debtor’s attorney to advise a client to take on more debt prior to filing bankruptcy. 

In my opinion, in these cases, not only is it appropriate to give this advice but not giving it would be irresponsible on my part as an attorney. For example,  a debtor who, due to job-loss or overwhelming medical expenses, is on the verge of losing his or her home in foreclosure may consider filing a Chapter 13 bankruptcy to make up the payment arrearages and save the home while, also, getting unsecured debt like medical expenses under control. At the same time, the debtor’s car may be on the verge of break-down, requiring a new one imminently. To maintain his or her employment, the debtor may genuinely need a reliable automobile, and, to make the payments under the Chapter 13 plan, the debtor definitely needs to maintain a certain level of income (under Chapter 13, there is an “ability to pay” test for a proposed payment plan). After the filing of the bankruptcy, it may be very difficult for the debtor to obtain financing for a new car. Under Chapter 13, in particular, it is quite possible to pay a secured debt like an automobile loan outside the plan, or, depending on the price of the car, in full or in part inside the plan. (The purchase of a very expensive, luxury car would likely be disallowed by the trustee or judge,  but 526(a)(4) doesn’t say, “Don’t advise a client to take on too much debt,” it says, “Don’t advise a client to take on any debt.”) It is therefore in the debtor’s interest and with no intent to defraud anybody to obtain that new car prior to filing.

The Sixth Circuit, which governs here in Michigan, has not made a similar ruling. Only the Fifth and Eighth Circuits have, so there is a split at the appellate level on this issue. Until (and if) this issue reaches the Supreme Court or the Sixth Circuit makes a similar decision one way or the other, the proffering of such advice and pre-bankruptcy planning in general will continue to be a tricky business in Michigan.

If you are considering filing bankruptcy and have any questions about how to handle such situations, please contact me at jhilla@aronofflinnell.com or (248) 977-4182 to schedule a free, initial consultation.

UPDATE:

Since this post was first drafted, the US Supreme Court has, in a case titled Milavetz, Gallop & Milavetz v. United States, that, in short, it is permissible for a bankruptcy attorney to advise a client to incur more debt so long as the “impelling reason” for the advice is not the client’s prospective bankruptcy. This is just as confusing as it sounds. See here for an excellent analysis and further explanation.

How Much Will I Have to Pay Each Month if I File Chapter 13?

istock_000006364141mediumThere are many variables which determine how much a monthly payment under Chapter 13 will be. Filing for bankruptcy under Chapter 13, which is a reorganization of your finances rather than a liquidation as under Chapter 7, is a complicated process. In a Chapter 13 filing, you work with your attorney to develop a payment plan which will allow you to catch-up the amount you are in arrears on one or more debts—generally secured debts, such as home or car loans. The amount that you pay each month to the Chapter 13 Plan is primarily driven by your ability to pay—that is, the amount of money you have each month after certain basic expenses are deducted from your monthly income.

Chapter 13 is the primary means by which homeowners, for one, are able to save homes subject to foreclosure through bankruptcy. A home loan is a “secured loan,” which means that the loan is guaranteed to the provider of the loan by some property. In the case of a home loan, it is generally the home itself. Likewise with a car loan or a boat loan. Through a Chapter 13 bankrutpcy, a debtor may strip secondary liens from properties, “cramdown” the value of automobile or other secured loans, and take other steps that are not possible in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy.

The purpose of a Chapter 13 is to allow the debtor to emerge at the end of the payment period in better financial shape, hopefully not having lost their home, car, or other property in the meantime. However, a Chapter 13 is not complete and underway until it is “confirmed” by the Bankruptcy Court, and the process of confirmation may, in the back and forth that occurs between the filing debtor’s attorney and the US Trustee assigned by the court to the case, result in the plan payment moving higher and lower depending on the resolution to whatever objections to confirmation the Trustee may have.

If you are considering filing bankruptcy and, especially, if you are considering taking that step to rescue a home facing foreclosure or some other property facing repossession, your best bet is too make an appointment with a bankruptcy attorney as soon as possible. Only after a plan is fully drafted according to your particular circumstances, filed, and confirmed will it be possible to know what the exact amount you will pay each month under the plan is and, indeed, what the length of the plan even may be.

To get the best results possible, please contact me at jhilla@aronofflinnell.com or (248) 977-4182 to schedule a free, initial consultation.